<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new biography of Madame de Maintenon, by Veronica Buckley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.catherinedelors.com/a-new-biography-of-madame-de-maintenon-by-veronica-buckley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.catherinedelors.com/a-new-biography-of-madame-de-maintenon-by-veronica-buckley/</link>
	<description>by historical novelist Catherine Delors, author of For the King</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammie Trites</title>
		<link>http://blog.catherinedelors.com/a-new-biography-of-madame-de-maintenon-by-veronica-buckley/#comment-6327</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammie Trites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinedelors.com/blog/a-new-biography-of-madame-de-maintenon-by-veronica-buckley/#comment-6327</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m definitely seeking for this facts. Finally, I determined it and with thanks to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely seeking for this facts. Finally, I determined it and with thanks to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Delors</title>
		<link>http://blog.catherinedelors.com/a-new-biography-of-madame-de-maintenon-by-veronica-buckley/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Delors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinedelors.com/blog/a-new-biography-of-madame-de-maintenon-by-veronica-buckley/#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Quite so, Suzanne. We have seen the problem with various biographies of Marie-Antoinette. The problem here was not that the author was not scrupulous, but it seems that she was not familiar enough with the context to distinguish between an authentic document and a modern work of fiction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oddly enough the most meticulously researched book about Madame de Maintenon may be a work of historical fiction, Françoise Chandernagor&#039;s magnificent &lt;i&gt;L&#039;Allée du Roi&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;The King&#039;s Way.&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite so, Suzanne. We have seen the problem with various biographies of Marie-Antoinette. The problem here was not that the author was not scrupulous, but it seems that she was not familiar enough with the context to distinguish between an authentic document and a modern work of fiction.</p>
<p>Oddly enough the most meticulously researched book about Madame de Maintenon may be a work of historical fiction, Françoise Chandernagor&#8217;s magnificent <i>L&#8217;Allée du Roi</i> (<i>The King&#8217;s Way.</i>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://blog.catherinedelors.com/a-new-biography-of-madame-de-maintenon-by-veronica-buckley/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinedelors.com/blog/a-new-biography-of-madame-de-maintenon-by-veronica-buckley/#comment-471</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a travesty that the main criterion in history and biography (even, or perhaps especially, popular history and biography) seems to be, &quot;is it entertaining?&quot; rather than &quot;is it factual?&quot; or &quot;is the author scrupulous about his or her sources?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a travesty that the main criterion in history and biography (even, or perhaps especially, popular history and biography) seems to be, &#8220;is it entertaining?&#8221; rather than &#8220;is it factual?&#8221; or &#8220;is the author scrupulous about his or her sources?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
